Re: memory managment in servers?

From: Andrew Valencia <vandys_at_nospam.org>
Date: Wed Nov 23 1994 - 09:07:58 PST

[Dave Hudson <dave@humbug.demon.co.uk> writes:]

>The message implementation is pretty simple, the biggest problem is how the
>kernel will decide that any particular process is a server and thus capable
>of responding to a FS_MEMORY message.

A bigger potential objection is that the VM page stealing system (when it
works, admittedly! :->) does this anyway, and doesn't have to add another
mechanism.

                                                Andy
Received on Wed Nov 23 08:44:35 1994

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Sep 22 2005 - 15:12:10 PDT