Re: Errors with 1.6.4

From: Erik Dalen <erik_at_nospam.org>
Date: Thu Oct 26 2000 - 23:57:45 PDT

If all the programs say perm it could be because you don't have a fpu...

/Erik

On Thu, 26 Oct 2000, Andy Valencia wrote:

> [Martin_Doering@mn.man.de writes:]
>
> >Now I'm back from my holidays and will have some tests again. One thing
> >first:
> >Does this mean, that 1.6.4 should work, or is it a very experimental
> >version?
>
> It should work pretty well--it's all I use for my own day-to-day work.
> I have one edge case of cluster numbering in a node (in \windows\temp,
> bleh) which I have to hunt down. But in general it's working quite
> well.
>
> >I can remember, that I always got a message "perm" after nearly every
> >command.
> >This could have something to do with the fat support, or maybe I did set
> >up something wrong. What should I send you to come behind, what's wrong? I
> >just set up all the stuff the way it is described. The only thing could
> >be, how I configured the servers from grub - the rest is just the zip
> >file. Or possibly I exceeded some limits? I have a 15 GB harddisk with the
> >first partition beeing a fat16 one.
>
> That's your exit status. If the command worked OK, I can't imagine what
> would cause its exit status to look funny.
>
> Andy
>
Received on Thu Oct 26 22:27:24 2000

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Sep 22 2005 - 15:12:56 PDT