> >But what about Plan9. Am I right that they have a Berkeley style
> >copyright? And that they have more documentation?
>
> I haven't seen the Plan9 restrictions. I'd be surprised if AT&T was as
> generous as the Berkeley distribution, but you never know.
Definitely not - the distribution terms for Plan9 are that you can
only exchange source with someone who has a valid plan9 license - so
you can't even post source diffs to the 9fans mailing list, let alone
the promised comp.os.plan9 newsgroup.
More info in:
http://plan9.att.com/plan9
That, plus the $350 charge for plan9 on CD-ROM, have made me a bit wary.
Alistair
PS. Nice work on 1.4, Andy.
-- Alistair G. Crooks (agc@uts.amdahl.com) +44 125 234 6377 Amdahl European HQ, Dogmersfield Park, Hartley Wintney, Hants RG27 8TE, UK. [These are only my opinions, and certainly not those of Amdahl Corporation]Received on Mon Aug 7 07:52:36 1995
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Sep 22 2005 - 15:12:27 PDT