server-based auth

From: Erik Quanstrom <quanstro_at_nospam.org>
Date: Wed Mar 15 1995 - 05:47:51 PST

>One idea I've toyed with is adding a bitmask to the system calls and another
>bitmask to the process. A process could only invoke system calls if
>((proc->p_mask & s->s_mask) != 0).

>For your scenario, the msg_connect() system call should be disabled. The
>process could then walk down current mount points, but could not access new
>servers. Other possibilities are disabling fork()/tfork()/clone() (perhaps
>a couple others). This would create an execution environment in which a
>process could serve requests but not much else.

why not let the servers themselves do the authentication, a la
the 9p? as in the message set

        Tauth
        Rauth

erik
Received on Wed Mar 15 05:02:32 1995

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Sep 22 2005 - 15:12:17 PDT