> Ok, good.  So now your disk server may be starting.  Are you sure you said
> "disk/wd_dos0"? 
No, I said "disk/wd:wd0_dos0"
> Your error message below looks like you configured
> disk/wd:wd0_dos0, which would be right for the first DOS partition on the
> first IDE disk.
That's the one.
> 
> Do ^Z to enter the kernel debugger, and "pr" to see the proceses.  Is there
> still a "wd" process? 
Yes.
> Do "pr <pid>" on it, and then do "bt <tid>" on the
> thread within it. 
The output of "pr 5" looks like:
        5 wd
         vas 181ea10 threads 181fa00 runq 181dda0 sys/usr 0/0
                .
                .
                .
         6 SLEEP kstack c0b000 uregs cobfc0 wchan 1819950 <none>/<none>
                .
                .
                .
I assume the "6 SLEEP" entry is the thread". (?)
> Let me know what the backtrace looks like (just routine
> names will be fine) and we can see where Mr. Disk has gone.
"bt 6" produces:
        _switch() called from _p_sema_v_lock + 18a
        _p_sema_v_lock() called from _msg_receive + 44
        _msg_receive() called from _syscall +dl
        _syscall() called from _Tsyscall + 17
Does this give you any clues?
Received on Sat Sep 19 20:06:52 1998
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Sep 22 2005 - 15:12:43 PDT