Re: Problems with gcc

From: Andy Valencia <vandys_at_nospam.org>
Date: Wed Sep 16 1998 - 12:24:26 PDT

[goconne@csc.UVic.CA (Gordon W. O'Connell) writes:]

> You were correct. I am trying to compile using a 386SX and no
> FPU. You mentioned that it is okay to use the compiler which
> comes with 1.5.2. I'm assuming that the executables I need
> to replace are: as, cc1, gcc, ld and cc. Is this a correct
> assumption? Or can I get away with just replaceing the
> gcc and cc1 components? Have I missed some components?

I would strongly recommend replacing all of them at once.

> Can the kernel build still use vsta.lnk to bind?

I believe the old "ld" didn't use this kind of file. The correct parameters
were compiled into it.

                                                        Andy
Received on Wed Sep 16 08:24:16 1998

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Sep 22 2005 - 15:12:43 PDT