> I'm looking at a change so that server ports are related to the thread which
> created them. Thus, it only requires the death of the server thread to
> cause a port to be scrubbed, which breaks this deadlock. This should work
> for most server which come to mind, but I want to look at some "pool of
> thread" servers which exist. The KA9Q port comes to mind, for instance.
Hmm.. would it still be possible to hand off ports between threads
after this change was made?
> Andy
Tim N.
Received on Thu May 21 08:10:10 1998
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Sep 22 2005 - 15:12:43 PDT