[edorman@Tanya.ucsd.edu (Eric Dorman) writes:]
>I did notice however that the response of the system as a whole
>seems to be more sluggish.  Startup is somewhat slower and response
>in different vtys is, well, 'sticky'.  It's kinda hard to explain..
>I'll try to quantify it more this wk.
Check "ps" to see who's running.  You might have a runaway process.
I saw this sort of behavior once, when nothing showed up in ps.  It turned
out to be the power management mode running wild; I had to reinitialize its
flash storage and reboot, after which things went back to normal.
>I had a few comments about the src tree:
>  srv/mach/fd, srv/mach/scsi, bin/init needs -lsrv in LDFLAGS.
Fixed in my latest private tree.  I'll put up a new snapshot when I get back
to the states.
>  srv/mach/joystick stuffers from coming from a dosfs; libjoystick.c
>and libjoystick.h get truncated filenames so the makefile dies.
Ah yes.
>  ls -l output format isin't conducive to pipelining, and I personally
>find it hard to read.  
There was a poprt of GNU "ls".  That'd help, I suppose.
>I was wondering what negative results might come from doing something
>like
>  mount fs/root:vsta /
>all the time, to construct a union mount in / of the dos stuff and the 
>vsta stuff.  The intent is to establish a Plan9ish consistency, 
>with /lib, /bin, /include etc. and writing the src tree to assume 
>these are the locations of stuff it needs.  This mount would eliminate 
>a depth dependency that exists in the src tree (all the -I/-L../../../ 
>stuff) and make 'mkall install' work regardless of where the src tree 
>resided, and more easily support more architectures.
No, actually all the relative stuff is so that you can move the tree
anywhere.  I don't want to change that.  The only remaining wart is that
/vsta/include should have a matching /vsta/src/include.
>  I haven't run into any trouble with this mount even though 
>it hides whatever bin/lib/include dos junk is beneath it, but I 
>have very little DOSstuff :)
Me, either.  I wrote Hearts for MGR so I could bear to de-install Windows
3.1. :-)
                                                        Andy
Received on Tue Jul 15 05:36:07 1997
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Sep 22 2005 - 15:12:43 PDT