Re: Event handlers

From: Andy Valencia <vandys_at_nospam.org>
Date: Mon Dec 18 2000 - 14:28:51 PST

["Eric Jacobs" <Eric_Jacobs@fc.mcps.k12.md.us> writes:]

>...
>I know that all of this is not going to be optimal, and if we were in the
>business of rewriting the driver set I'm sure we could do things
>better. The good news is that a lot of these options could be selected
>at run-time (for example, if we knew it was okay, we could load a
>driver to run single-threaded, and its structure would reduce to
>something vaguely similar to the way native VSTa drivers are
>written.) Maybe we need something like the FreeBSD "ports" system,
>where we can collect data on how to run each driver best.

Hey, in the proud tradition of experimentation, I'd say go for it. The
worst that can happen is that you'll discover what needs to be changed. And
most likely, not much. BTW, the new event handling system (handle_event()
and friends, see src/lib/event.c) should let you plug into this nicely.

Above all... have fun!

Andy Valencia
Received on Mon Dec 18 14:20:24 2000

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Sep 22 2005 - 15:12:57 PDT